By Julian P. T. Higgins, Sally Green
Chapter 1 creation (pages 1–9): Sally eco-friendly, Julian PT Higgins, Philip Alderson, Mike Clarke, Cynthia D Mulrow and Andrew D Oxman
Chapter 2 getting ready a Cochrane evaluate (pages 11–30): Sally eco-friendly and Julian PT Higgins
Chapter three keeping reports: Updates, Amendments and suggestions (pages 31–49): Julian PT Higgins, Sally eco-friendly and Rob JPM Scholten
Chapter four consultant to the Contents of a Cochrane Protocol and evaluate (pages 51–79): Julian PT Higgins and Sally Green
Chapter five Defining the evaluate query and constructing standards for together with experiences (pages 81–94): Denise O'Connor, Sally eco-friendly and Julian PT Higgins
Chapter 6 trying to find experiences (pages 95–150): Carol Lefebvre, Eric Manheimer and Julie Glanville
Chapter 7 determining reviews and gathering information (pages 151–185): Julian PT Higgins and Jonathan J Deeks
Chapter eight Assessing possibility of Bias in incorporated stories (pages 187–241): Julian PT Higgins and Douglas G Altman
Chapter nine Analysing info and project Meta?Analyses (pages 243–296): Jonathan J Deeks, Julian PT Higgins and Douglas G Altman
Chapter 10 Addressing Reporting Biases (pages 297–333): Jonathan AC Sterne, Matthias Egger and David Moher
Chapter eleven offering effects and ‘Summary of Findings’ Tables (pages 335–357): Holger J Schunemann, Andrew D Oxman, Julian PT Higgins, Gunn E Vist, Paul Glasziou and Gordon H Guyatt
Chapter 12 analyzing effects and Drawing Conclusions (pages 359–387): Holger J Schunemann, Andrew D Oxman, Gunn E Vist, Julian PT Higgins, Jonathan J Deeks, Paul Glasziou and Gordon H Guyatt
Chapter thirteen together with Non?Randomized reports (pages 389–432): Barnaby C Reeves, Jonathan J Deeks, Julian PT Higgins and George A Wells
Chapter 14 adversarial results (pages 433–448): Yoon ok Loke, Deirdre expense and Andrew Herxheimer
Chapter 15 Incorporating Economics proof (pages 449–479): Ian Shemilt, Miranda Mugford, Sarah Byford, Michael Drummond, Eric Eisenstein, Martin Knapp, Jacqueline Mallender, David McDaid, Luke Vale and Damian Walker
Chapter sixteen distinct themes in facts (pages 481–529): Julian PT Higgins, Jonathan J Deeks and Douglas G Altman
Chapter 17 Patient?Reported results (pages 531–545): Donald L Patrick, Gordon H Guyatt and Catherine Acquadro
Chapter 18 stories of person sufferer information (pages 547–558): Lesley A Stewart, Jayne F Tierney and Mike Clarke
Chapter 19 potential Meta?Analysis (pages 559–570): Davina Ghersi, Jesse Berlin and Lisa Askie
Chapter 20 Qualitative study and Cochrane studies (pages 571–591): Jane Noyes, Jennie Popay, Alan Pearson, Karin Hannes and Andrew Booth
Chapter 21 studies in Public overall healthiness and future health promoting (pages 593–606): Rebecca Armstrong, Elizabeth Waters and Jodie Doyle
Chapter 22 Overviews of reports (pages 607–631): Lorne A Becker and Andrew D Oxman
Read or Download Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series PDF
Best medical books
This publication offers a finished, updated and important assessment of the immunological elements of autoimmune neurological ailment. those ailments contain universal stipulations resembling a number of sclerosis, the Guillain-Barre syndrome, and myasthenia gravis. The publication starts off with chapters on antigen popularity and self-nonself attractiveness, and neuroimmunology, by way of chapters on particular illnesses.
This can be a 3-in-1 reference publication. It supplies an entire clinical dictionary protecting hundreds of thousands of phrases and expressions on the subject of hallucinations. It additionally offers huge lists of bibliographic citations. ultimately, it presents details to clients on tips on how to replace their wisdom utilizing a number of net assets.
The Pocket medication handbook from Massachusetts normal clinic, Boston, presents key medical facts for college kids and citizens. It comprises components of inner drugs, cardiology, pulmonary, gastroenterology, nephrology, hematology-oncology, infectious ailments, endocrinology, and rheumatology.
Preface by way of T. Morrison,Director-General of the ecu DiagnosticManufacturers organization. participants: W. Kewenig; G. Forlani, J. Marriage, G. Ulloa This e-book is predicated upon a file ready on the request of the ecu fee. Its function is to set out the prevailing legislation regulating the improvement, creation, distribution and use of invitro diagnostic scientific units (IVDMD) within the U.
- Cipro - A Medical Dictionary, Bibliography, and Annotated Research Guide to Internet References
- Dermatitis - A Medical Dictionary, Bibliography, and Annotated Research Guide to Internet References
- Everyday Medical Ethics and Law: British Medical Association Ethics Department
- A Handbook for Medical Teachers
- Nitric Oxide - A Medical Dictionary, Bibliography, and Annotated Research Guide to Internet References
- Esophageal Cancer, An Issue of Gastroenterology Clinics, 1st Edition
Extra info for Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
This ensures that tasks such as selection of studies for eligibility and data extraction can be performed by at least two people independently, increasing the likelihood that errors are detected. If more than one team expresses an interest in undertaking a review on the same topic, it is likely that a CRG will encourage them to work together. OTE/SPH JWBK247-02 OTE/SPH August 22, 2008 21:9 18 Printer Name: Yet to Come CH 02 PREPARING A COCHRANE REVIEW Review teams must include expertise in the topic area being reviewed and include, or have access to, expertise in systematic review methodology (including statistical expertise).
A review is re-published (amended or updated) after declaring it to be a new citation version. 5. A review is re-published after it has been withdrawn; or a review is created by splitting an existing protocol or review; or a review is created by merging existing protocols or reviews. g. changes to conclusions, authors or correcting serious errors). g. g. g. e. e. g. correcting a minor error, or changing methods Summary of changes to Cochrane reviews We call these new citation versions. g. using a flag) – in particular, those that change their conclusions such that they should be read again.
6. Correction of serious error in citation (Erratum) A review may be classified as a new citation version with conclusions not changed if a serious error in the citation record needs to be corrected. g. to spelling of an author’s name) are the sort that would warrant a published erratum in a traditional paper journal. An update is not necessary for an erratum. Critical errors that affect conclusions are covered under criterion 2 above. 3 IMPORTANT DATES ASSOCIATED WITH COCHRANE REVIEWS 39 New citation versions are further classified as ‘conclusions changed’ or ‘conclusions not changed’.