Decade of Transition: Eisenhower, Kennedy, and the origins by Abraham Ben-Zvi

Decade of Transition: Eisenhower, Kennedy, and the origins by Abraham Ben-Zvi

By Abraham Ben-Zvi

Show description

Read Online or Download Decade of Transition: Eisenhower, Kennedy, and the origins of the American-Israeli alliance PDF

Best israel & palestine books

The Dark Side of Zionism: The Quest for Security through Dominance

The thesis of The darkish aspect of Zionism, bobbing up from new histories missed by means of the media, is that either the early Zionists and the Israelis sought their defense via army domination of the indigenous Arab inhabitants of Palestine. This technique required heading off negotiations with the Palestinians in addition to demonstrating Israeli army may possibly via wars initiated opposed to Arab states against an Israeli takeover of Palestine.

The Jewish Radical Right: Revisionist Zionism and Its Ideological Legacy

The Jewish Radical correct is the 1st entire research of Zionist Revisionist inspiration within the Nineteen Twenties and Thirties and of its ideological legacy in modern day Israel. The Revisionists, below the management of Ze'ev Jabotinsky, provided a thorough view of Jewish historical past and a progressive imaginative and prescient for its destiny.

The Pursuit of Peace and the Crisis of Israeli Identity: Defending / Defining the Nation

This publication deals a theoretically-informed research of ways within which Israeli nationwide identification has formed Israel's international coverage. through linking family identification politics to Israeli overseas coverage, it unearths how a trouble of Israeli id infected the controversy in Israel over the Oslo peace procedure.

Gaza: Morality, Law & Politics

It is a ebook that explores nationalism, intractability, the purpose of no go back, and the jurisdiction over warfare crimes. In Gaza: legislation, Morality and Politics, editor Raimond Gaita brings jointly a thought-provoking number of essays by means of specialists as regards to clash. The booklet is a significant other to a sequence of lectures of an identical identify held in 2009 at Australian Catholic college.

Extra info for Decade of Transition: Eisenhower, Kennedy, and the origins of the American-Israeli alliance

Sample text

Israel could not give up vital points . . S. and Israel, 1953–1956 Arab-Israeli sphere. Faced with this unwavering Israeli refusal to predicate its peace posture upon the belief that a unilateral concession on its part would ultimately trigger a mutually beneficial process of conflict reduction, the Secretary of State resorted to harsh coercive threats, which were not augmented by any explicit or implicit promise of compensation or inducement: . . We must know whether Israel would be willing to make concessions or not.

7 Divergence Dominates 23 Not only was the course of this conversation characteristic of the general, innate nature of American-Israeli relations during this period, which were permeated with tension and fraught with disagreement and misunderstanding, but its inconsequential outcome reflected the recurrent failure of a strategy that relied almost exclusively upon coercive tools and methods while avoiding any significant concrete and tangible reassuring accommodative measures vis-à-vis Israel. Indeed, a review of the conversation between Secretary of State Dulles and Foreign Minister Sharett, which took place on November 21, 1955, more than two and a half years after Secretary Assistant Byroade had unsuccessfully tried to set in motion a peacemaking process on the basis of certain Israeli unilateral territorial concessions, indicates that the respective expectations and negotiating strategies of the two parties remained essentially intact, although the American side had now a more concrete notion of the nature of the desired Israeli withdrawal (which reflected the Anglo-American “Alpha” plan) than was the case on April 21, 1953.

Was obtained because the Arab states refused to accept the partition plan and invaded Palestine to attack the Jews. Territory can only be taken away from Israel by force of arms, the Foreign Minister added . . Mr. S. and Israel, 1953–1956 standing of Israel’s position as enunciated by the Foreign Minister means Israel would make no territorial concessions and that the refugees must all be settled elsewhere than in Israel. ” . . Mr. Byroade suggested that since neither Israel nor the Arab states appeared willing to devise a plan for peace, the United States might have to make its own plan—and it was probable that neither side would like it.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.38 of 5 – based on 13 votes
Comments are closed.