By Larry Alexander
A exotic overseas crew of felony theorists study the problem of constitutionalism and pose such foundational questions as: Why have a structure? How can we be aware of what the structure of a rustic rather is? How may still a structure be interpreted? the amount may be of specific value to these in philosophy, legislation, political technology and diplomacy attracted to even if and what different types of constitutions might be followed in nations with out them, and inquisitive about debates approximately constitutional interpretation.
Read or Download Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations PDF
Similar constitutional law books
The migration of constitutional principles throughout jurisdictions is likely one of the crucial good points of up to date constitutional perform. The expanding use of comparative jurisprudence in analyzing constitutions is one instance of this. during this 2007 publication, top figures within the examine of comparative constitutionalism and comparative constitutional politics from North the US, Europe and Australia talk about the dynamic techniques wherein constitutional platforms effect one another.
A complete examine the commercial family between states, and the way they may be greater optimized. during this groundbreaking quantity, Joseph F. Zimmerman examines interstate financial family members. He explores the background of congressional and judicial floor ideas governing such kin, direct and oblique interstate alternate obstacles and technique of their removing, and interstate festival for tax sales, enterprise agencies, activities franchises, travelers, and gamblers.
Many have argued lately that the U. S. constitutional procedure exalts person rights over duties, virtues, and the typical strong. Answering the fees opposed to liberal theories of rights, James Fleming and Linda McClain improve and guard a civic liberalism that takes obligations and virtues—as good as rights—seriously.
This booklet explains a paradox in American constitutional legislation: how a correct no longer mentioned through the ratification debates at Philadelphia and never pointed out within the textual content has turn into a middle section of smooth freedom. fairly, privateness is a constitutional afterthought that has won strength via glossy interpretations of an previous textual content.
- Freedom of Speech and Press: Exceptions to the First Amendment
- Discrimination Law and Practice, Edition: 4th
- The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Health Care Reform
- Comparative Constitutional Design (Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy)
- Living Originalism
Extra resources for Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations
So, how come the Constitution doesn’t say in so many words that capital punishment is okay as long as certain due process is given? Because the Constitution doesn’t restate the whole of the criminal law, which had always imposed the death penalty for murder, treason, and other “infamous” crimes. The presence of these references to capital punishment in the Fifth and Fourteenth amendments, side by side with the ban on “cruel and unusual punishments” in the Eighth Amendment, makes it crystal clear that capital punishment in itself was not viewed as being cruel and unusual.
Although the Unites States was born out of a bitter struggle with Britain, the leading citizens of the new nation — including the Framers of the Constitution (see Chapter 1) — were of British stock. They were educated men steeped in English law and familiar with British political institutions and philosophy. S. Constitution drew on these British sources — but no wonder either that it departed from British traditions in some major ways too, sometimes deliberately and sometimes accidentally. indd 17 4/15/09 10:59:52 PM 18 Part I: Exploring Constitutional Basics Building on Magna Carta Magna Carta (Latin for “Great Charter”) is a document dating back to the year 1215 containing a number of concessions made by King John of England to his rebellious barons.
Analyzing the Concepts Underlying the Declaration of Independence The American colonists had an ambivalent attitude toward the British Constitution. Their leaders steeped themselves in the traditions of the British Constitution and generally identified with the revolutionary spirit that had led to the execution of one king — Charles I in 1649 — and the expulsion of another — James II in 1689. They regarded themselves as entitled to the same rights as natural-born Englishmen but found themselves treated at best as second-class subjects.